首页分享基于IPA法的上海市公园绿地花境景观评价研究

基于IPA法的上海市公园绿地花境景观评价研究

来源：花匠小妙招时间：2024-11-07 04:45

基金项目:

上海市绿化和市容管理局科学技术项目“上海花境的冬季景观提升研究”（编号：G202512）

Study on the Evaluation of Flower Border Landscape of Park Green Space in Shanghai Based on IPA Method

Author:

WU Yuanyu

1. School of Landscape Architecture, Beijing Forestry University, National Engineering Research Center for Floriculture, Beijing Laboratory of Urban and Rural Ecological Environment, Beijing, China, 100083;
在知网中查找
在百度中查找
在本站中查找

QIN Shiyu

WU jin

2. Shanghai Municipal Administration Center of Parks, Shanghai, China, 200023;
在知网中查找
在百度中查找
在本站中查找

ZHANG Yali

3. Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China, 201403
在知网中查找
在百度中查找
在本站中查找

WANG Meixian

摘要 | | 访问统计 | | | |

摘要:

以上海市20处公园绿地中的花境作为研究对象，采用重要度—表现度分析法（IPA），从花境的基本结构、景观设计、植物材料、施工养护4个维度进行景观评价，探究游人及专业人士对公园绿地花境的满意度，分析花境建设存在的问题及未来重点提升的方向。结果表明：（1）游人与专业人士对花境的整体满意度均大于3.5分，表现为较为满意；（2）在基本结构方面，两类人群的综合重要度均较高，游人表现为较为满意而专业人士则较低，其中两类人群观赏距离的满意度均为最低；（3）在景观设计方面，游人的综合重要度较低，表现为高于预期较为满意，专业人士的综合重要度较高，满意度较低，其中两类人群的色彩设计重要度均值最高，花境观赏期设计是重点提升的指标；（4）在植物材料方面，两类人群的综合重要度及满意度均高于3.5，游人的分值均高于专业人士，其中花色花型需优先得到提升；（5）在施工养护方面，游人的综合重要度低于3.5，对施工养护的重视度较低，两类人群均表现为较为满意。分析得出，能够近距离观赏互动、色彩鲜艳、花朵突出且四季可观的花境易获得公众的喜爱，花境的观赏距离、色彩设计、花色花型、观赏期设计及科普教育功能是今后花境实践需着重优化的方面。

Abstract:

The flower border in 20 parks in Shanghai was selected as the research object, and the importance-performance analysis (IPA) was used to evaluate the landscape from four dimensions: the basic structure of the flower border, landscape design, plant materials, construction and maintenance, to explore the satisfaction of tourists and professionals on the flower border of green space in the park, and to analyze the problems existing in the construction of flower border and the direction of key improvement in the future. The results show that: (1) The overall satisfaction of tourists and professionals to the flower border is more than 3.5 points, which shows that they are relatively satisfied. (2) In terms of the basic structure, the comprehensive importance of the two groups of people is higher, tourists are more satisfied, while professionals are lower, and the satisfaction of viewing distance of the two groups of people is the lowest. (3) In terms of landscape design, the comprehensive importance of tourists is low, which shows that they are more satisfied than expected. The comprehensive importance of professionals is high, and their satisfaction is low. The average importance of color design of the two groups is the highest, and the design of the flower border viewing period is the key index to improve. (4) In terms of plant materials, the comprehensive importance and satisfaction of the two groups of people are higher than 3.5, and the scores of tourists are higher than those of professionals, among which the colors and patterns need to be improved first. (5) In terms of construction and maintenance, tourists’ comprehensive importance is less than 3.5, and they pay less attention to construction and maintenance. Both groups of people are relatively satisfied. The analysis shows that the flower border with interactive, bright colors, prominent flowers and considerable seasons is easy to be loved by the public. The viewing distance, color design, flower type, viewing period design and popular science education function of the flower border should be optimized in the future.

引用本文分享文章指标点击次数:49 下载次数: 619 HTML阅读次数: 0 引用次数: 0