认知和情感共情与负性情绪:情绪调节的作用机制
摘要:
情绪调节在社会情境中对认知和情感共情的影响尚待厘清, 这一问题的阐明将有助于理解社会交互中负性情绪的产生和影响机制, 为未来的社会认知干预提供理论基础。本文通过问卷调查验证了共情、情绪调节与负性情绪之间的关系, 并采用中文版共情准确性任务探讨认知重评策略使用对共情情绪反应的影响。结果发现: 情感共情与日常生活中更多的焦虑和压力有关, 而认知共情与更少的抑郁情绪相关, 认知重评和表达抑制均在共情与负性情绪之间起保护性调节作用; 共情准确性任务中, 使用认知重评策略能提高个体对他人消极情绪的共情准确性、降低自身的负性情绪体验; 在积极情境下还可以增强个体的积极情绪。结果表明情绪调节, 特别是认知重评, 在认知和情感共情与负性情绪之间发挥着重要作用。
关键词: 认知共情, 情感共情, 认知重评, 表达抑制, 负性情绪
Abstract:
Empathy refers to understanding, inferring and sharing others’ emotional states, which can be divided into affective and cognitive components. Although empathy contributes to prosocial behaviors and harmonious interpersonal relationships, it also increases an individual’s negative emotional experiences and affect distress. Emotion regulation, the psychological process of managing one’s own emotions, has been found to be closely associated with empathy. Cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression are two commonly used strategies to regulate emotions, of which cognitive reappraisal is effective in reducing negative emotional experiences while expressive suppression is usually correlated with more affective distress. However, the roles of emotion regulation strategies in the empathic response are still unclear.
We conducted two studies to investigate the roles of emotion regulation on the negative affect related to empathy using self-report questionnaires and experimental task respectively. Study 1 administered the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy (QCAE), the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ), and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21) to 442 college students. The moderating effects of cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression on the association between empathy and negative affect were examined separately. Study 2 adopted the Chinese version of the Empathic Accuracy Task (EAT) to further examine the effect of emotion regulation (i.e. cognitive reappraisal) on cognitive empathy and affective responses. The EAT requires participants to continuously rate targets’ emotional valence in video clips as a second person and rate emotional valence and arousal of both targets and themselves after each video. Seventy-five participants (33 for experiment 1 and 42 for experiment 2) were recruited to perform the EAT under two conditions, i.e., naturally viewing without any instructions and applying cognitive reappraisal while viewing the scenarios. Paired sample t tests and repeated-measure ANOVA were performed to examine the effect of cognitive reappraisal on task performance.
Findings from Study 1 showed that affective empathy was significantly correlated with higher levels of anxiety and stress, while empathic concern was correlated with less anxiety, stress and depression. However, when participants endorsed cognitive reappraisal more frequently, such positive association between affective empathy and stress was reduced, while the negative association between empathic concern and anxiety was strengthened. Cognitive empathy was significantly correlated with reduced depression. Expressive suppression strengthened the negative association between cognitive empathy and depression. Moreover, negative correlations between cognitive empathy and anxiety as well as stress emerged for participants endorsing cognitive reappraisal more frequently. Findings from Study 2 showed that task performances of the EAT were significantly improved when participants endorsed cognitive reappraisal strategy compared to the condition of naturally viewing. Specifically, under the cognitive reappraisal condition participants scored higher empathic accuracy, experienced less negative affect in reaction to others’ affect distress, and experienced more positive affect in reaction to others’ positive emotions.
Taken together, the findings from these two studies suggested that both cognitive reappraisal and expressive suppression play a protective role in the associations between empathy and negative affect, and the endorsement of cognitive reappraisal would improve task performance on both cognitive and affective empathy. Our findings shed light on the psychological mechanisms of empathy and provide new approach for improving individuals’ social cognitive ability, especially for early intervention in clinical and subclinical populations.
Key words: cognitive empathy, affective empathy, cognitive reappraisal, expressive suppression, negative affect
中图分类号:
B842
相关知识
疼痛共情对大学生负性情绪注意偏向的影响研究
我院情绪与健康心理学团队揭示动机强度对情绪调节策略偏好的影响及其认知机制
心自由教育品牌口碑好,成长的情绪调节工具箱:教孩子应对情绪风暴的策略
放松情绪表情调节
芳香疗法对肿瘤患者及其家属负性情绪的影响
青少年认知情绪调节与行为抑制行为激活系统的关系
花香,调节你的情绪与神经
大学生依恋与心理弹性——情绪调节与元情绪的多重中介
Science丨从他人的痛苦中获得力量?负面情绪也能成为“超能力”
不同嗅觉情境对情绪面孔再认的影响
网址: 认知和情感共情与负性情绪:情绪调节的作用机制 https://www.huajiangbk.com/newsview715360.html
上一篇: (实用)《咏鹅》教学设计15篇 |
下一篇: 情绪调节策略对生气情绪的调节作用 |
推荐分享

- 1君子兰什么品种最名贵 十大名 4012
- 2世界上最名贵的10种兰花图片 3364
- 3花圈挽联怎么写? 3286
- 4迷信说家里不能放假花 家里摆 1878
- 5香山红叶什么时候红 1493
- 6花的意思,花的解释,花的拼音 1210
- 7教师节送什么花最合适 1167
- 8勿忘我花图片 1103
- 9橄榄枝的象征意义 1093
- 10洛阳的市花 1039