不同灌水频率条件下设施土壤水盐运移特征
摘要: 为了寻求防治设施土壤次生盐渍化的最适灌水频率,通过野外调查与室内土柱模拟试验相结合的方法,分析了不同灌水频率条件下设施土壤剖面水分、盐分及主要离子的变化特征。结果表明,各灌水处理土壤剖面水分变化主要集中在0~20 cm深度土壤,30和40 cm深度土壤为土壤水分的“渡层”,提高灌水频率可使上部土壤含水量增高至0.36 cm3·cm-3。当灌水总量一定时,1次·(5 d)-1处理不利于土壤剖面水分蓄存。1次·(5 d)-1处理对土壤剖面盐分的淋洗效果优于其他处理,但其质量中心深度为23.71 cm,存在返盐风险。就1次·(5 d)-1处理而言,除对Na+淋洗率较低外,其余离子的淋洗率均高于其他处理,其中NO3-淋洗率可达65.68%。根据各灌水处理土壤剖面中的水盐分布状况,提出1次·(10 d)-1为此次试验条件下的最适灌水频率。
Abstract: In order to explore the most suitable irrigation frequency that could prevent secondary salinization of the soil in greenhouse, field investigations and an indoor soil column simulation experiment were carried out and variation of soil moisture, soil salt and some other major ions in soil profile were monitored and analyzed relative to irrigation frequency. Results show that variation of soil water content with irrigation frequency occurred mainly in the 0-20 cm depth soil. The 30 and 40 cm depth soil were soil water transition layers. Increased irrigation frequency could increase soil moisture content in the top soil layer up to 0.36 cm3·cm-3. When the total volume of irrigation water was set, Treatment one time·(5 d)-1, that is, irrigation conducted once every 5 days, was not conductive to moisture storage in the soil profile, but conducive to salt leaching, and better than any other treatments in this effect. However, in this case the mass center was at 23.71 cm in depth, posing a risk of salt uprising. Treatment one time·(5 d)-1 was higher than all the other treatments in leaching rate of all the ions, except Na+, and the leaching rate of NO3- could reach as high as 65.68%. Based on the data of distribution of water and salt in soil profiles of all the treatments, Treatment one time·(10 d)-1 or irrigation once every 10 days is considered to be the most suitable irrigation frequency under the conditions of this experiment.
[1] 余海英,李廷轩,周健民.设施土壤次生盐渍化及其对土壤性质的影响[J].土壤,2005,37(6):581-586. [2]COTE C M,BRISTOW K L,ROSS P J.Increasing the Efficiency of Solute Leaching:Impacts of Flow Interruption With Drainage of the "Preferential Flow Paths"[J].Journal of Contaminant Hydrology,2000,43(4):191-209.
[3]NACHABE M H,AHUJA L R,BUTTERSB G.Bromide Transport Under Sprinkler and Flood Irrigation for No-Till Soil Condition[J].Journal of Hydrology,1999,214(4):8-17.
[4] 冯兆忠,王效科,冯宗炜,等.内蒙古河套灌区秋浇对不同类型农田土壤盐分淋失的影响[J].生态与农村环境学报,2003,19(3):31-34. [5]JONG G W,JANG S C,SEUNG P L,et al.Water Saving by Shallow Intermittent Irrigation and Growth of Rice[J].Plant Production Science,2005,8(4):487-492.
[6] 吴军虎,费良军,赵茜,等.土壤间歇入渗水肥耦合特性试验研究[J].农业工程学报,2006,22(4):28-31. [7]BEHERA S K,PANDA R K.Effect of Fertilization and Irrigation Schedule on Water and Fertilizer Solute Transport for Wheat Crop in a Sub-Humid Sub-Tropical Region[J].Agriculture,Ecosystems and Environment,2009,130(4):141-155.
[8] 曹红霞,康绍忠,何华.蒸发和灌水频率对土壤水分分布影响的研究[J].农业工程学报,2003,19(6):1-4. [9]WEISBROD N,NATIVH R,ADAR K M,et al.Salt Accumulation and Flushing in Unsaturated Fractures in an Arid Environment[J].Ground Water,2005,38(3):452-461.
[10] 贾辉,张宏伟,费良军.循环率对一维间歇入渗土壤水、氮运移分布影响的室内试验[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(2):92-96. [11] 彭振阳,伍靖伟,黄介生.间歇入渗对土壤溶质淋洗效率的影响[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(20):128-134. [12]MERMOUD A,TAMINI T D,YACOUB H.Impacts of Different Irrigation Schedules on the Water Balance Components of an Onion Crop in a Semi-Arid Zone[J].Agricultural Water Management,2005,77(3):282-295.
[13]CAMPOSEO S,RUBINOP.Effect of Irrigation Frequency on Root Water Uptake in Sugar Beet[J].Plant & Soil,2003,253(2):301-309.
[14]JORDAN J E,WHITE R H,VICTOR D M,et al.Effect of Irrigation Frequency on Turf Quality,Shoot Density,and Root Length Density of Five Bent Grass Cultivar[J].Crop Science,2003,43(1):282-287.
[15] 鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].3版.北京:中国农业出版社,1999:183-199. [16] 刘媛媛,李廷轩,余海英,等.有机肥与尿素配施对设施土壤盐分含量与组成变化的影响[J].农业环境科学学报,2009,28(2):292-298. [17] 曹红霞,康绍忠,李天华.蒸发和灌水频率对土壤中NO3-运移影响的研究[J].灌溉排水学报,2007,26(6):44-46. [18] 王振华,郑旭荣,任杰,等.灌水频率对地下滴灌线源入渗土壤水分运动规律影响的试验研究[J].水利学报,2007(增刊1):299-302. [19] 巨龙,王全九,王琳芳,等.灌水量对半干旱区土壤水盐分布特征及冬小麦产量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2007,23(1):86-90. [20] 郑国保,张源沛,孔德杰,等.不同灌水次数对日光温室番茄土壤水分动态变化规律的影响[J].中国农学通报,2011,27(22):192-196. [21] 王建东,龚时宏,于颖多,等.地面灌溉水频率对土壤水与温度及春玉米生长的影响[J].水利学报,2008,39(4):502-505. [22] 李卫,郑子成,李廷轩,等.设施灌溉条件下不同次生盐渍化土壤盐分离子迁移特征[J].农业机械学报,2011,42(5):92-99. [23] 余海英,李廷轩,周健民.设施土壤盐分的累积、迁移及离子组成变化特征[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2007,13(4):642-650. [24] 谭军利,康跃虎,焦艳平,等.不同种植年限覆膜滴灌盐碱地土壤盐分离子分布特征[J].农业工程学报,2008,24(6):59-63.相关知识
北疆膜下滴灌棉花土壤水盐运移特征及耗水规律试验研究
不同水分处理对膜下滴灌棉花生理指标及产量的影响
棉田水肥一体化技术发展现状及展望
滴灌频率和定额对枸杞园土壤水热分布 及产量的影响
智能化膜下滴灌条件下棉花灌溉制度试验研究
利用气象资料指导膜下滴灌棉花灌溉的试验研究
Water saving potential and mechanisms of subsurface drip irrigation: A review
华北平原膜下滴灌棉花水分利用效率及产量对供水方式响应研究
地下滴灌条件下棉花土壤水分运移田间试验研究
棉花咸水灌溉利用试验
网址: 不同灌水频率条件下设施土壤水盐运移特征 https://www.huajiangbk.com/newsview306315.html
上一篇: 灌溉频率与施氮量对滴灌春小麦群体 |
下一篇: 滴灌条件下灌溉量和频率对杂交棉生 |
推荐分享

- 1君子兰什么品种最名贵 十大名 4012
- 2世界上最名贵的10种兰花图片 3364
- 3花圈挽联怎么写? 3286
- 4迷信说家里不能放假花 家里摆 1878
- 5香山红叶什么时候红 1493
- 6花的意思,花的解释,花的拼音 1210
- 7教师节送什么花最合适 1167
- 8勿忘我花图片 1103
- 9橄榄枝的象征意义 1093
- 10洛阳的市花 1039